Textbooks
Introduction to Policy Debate
Printer Friendly Version
This free online textbook is available to all. No log-in is required to view any of the chapters and sections.
Thanks to generous contributions from Bill Smelko, William Smelko, and Rebecca (Gray) Jordan, we have been able to radically expand the available content.
There are three popular types of high school debate – policy debate, Lincoln-Douglas, and Public Forum (a relatively recent addition). This book is focused on policy debate.
Policy debate is a “team” activity. Team means that you debate with a partner. It’s two on two – two people defend the affirmative and two people defend the negative. Each two person team from a given school or school district makes-up a larger squad that you are a part of.
Each person in the debate gets one constructive speech, one rebuttal speech, is asked questions for three minutes by the opposing side after his or her constructive speech, and has one three minute opportunity to ask questions of the other side. A debate lasts approximately an hour and a half and is broken down in the following way:
First Affirmative Constructive (1AC)
8 minutes
Cross Examination of the 1AC (by the 2NC)
3 minutes
First Negative Constructive (1NC)
Cross examination of the 1NC (by the 1AC)
3 minutes
Second Affirmative Constructive (2AC)
8 minutes
Cross Examination of the 2AC (by the 1NC)
Second Negative Constructive (2NC)
8 minutes
Cross Examination of the 2NC (by the 2AC)
First Negative Rebuttal (1NR)
5 minutes
First Affirmative Rebuttal (1AR)
5 minutes
Second Negative Rebuttal (2NR)
5 minutes
Second Affirmative Rebuttal (2AR)
5 minutes
Each time also receives a “bank” of preparation time that partners divide amongst themselves in any way that they wish to prepare for speeches during the course of the debate. The amount of preparation times varies by tournament, but is usually either 5, 8, or 10 minutes.
The responsibilities of each side and speaker are generally discussed in the next section and in more detail in following chapters.
Hot Files
Other Textbooks
- 2003-4 Ocean Policy Topic Guide
- 2004-5 United Nations Peacekeeping
- 2005-6 Civil Liberties Topic Guide
- 2006-7 National Service Topic Guide
- 2007-8 Africa Topic Guide
- 2008-9 Topic Guide: Alternative Energy
- 2010-11 Military Presence Topic Guide
- Debating Social Services and Poverty
- Introduction to Policy Debate
- Understanding Kritiks
Related Blogs
- Use Naming Conventions To Organize Paperless Files
- Harvard Institute for Public Forum Debate
- QatarDebate launches Academy in Oman
- The Great Debaters: Alternative School is Winning Big
- Debating a Way to A Brighter Future
- Speech and debate results for Loyola, Sentinel
- Windsor High debate team members go undefeated
- 11 Skills You'll Need for a Career
- MHS Debate team wins, places at Randolph
- Full Tuition Scholarships Available
- Urban debate contests sharpen learning, skills for college-bound students
- Students who participate in debate do better in school
- A Date With Debate
- Boston Urban Debate League Chosen as Offical Charity of the Boston Marathon!
- Remaining Camp Files Uploaded
Related Evidence
- AT: Budget Isn't Being Debated
- Congressional Debate
- AT: Public Health T Debates exclusionary/genocidal
- AT: “Public Health” Debates Aren’t Educational
- Predictions in Debate good for Futurism
- Predictions Catalyze Debate/Mobilization
- Focus on Deliberate Racist Outcomes Diverts Racism Debate to One over Study Methodology
- Verification Reduces Benefits without Public Debate
- Open and Public Debates Key to Increases Public Support for Poverty Policies
- Open and Public Debates Key to Expose Racism and Bias
- Open and Public Debates Key to Inclusion of Different Perspectives
- Open and Public Debates Key to Structural Reform
- Discourse in Debate Rounds Uniquely Important
- Switch Side Debate Good/Relativism Answers
- AT: Debaters are just spectators

